This SEARCH bar is provided for your convenience. If you choose to click NEXT BLOG, The Thirsty Theologian will not be responsible for your resulting destination.
Phil JohnsonClarifying Calvinism
Clarifying Calvinism

Part I: Is Arminianism damnable heresy?
Wise advice from Phil: My advice to young Calvinists is to learn theology from the historic mainstream Calvinist authors, not from blogs and discussion forums on the Internet.

Part II: Spurgeon: “Calvinism IS the Gospel”
Arminianism is inherently inconsistent. Arminians technically affirm the fundamental, essential truths of the gospel. Then they try to build a theology on top of that which is totally inconsistent with the solid foundation they have affirmed.

Part III: Some book recommendations
The first book I want to recommend is a new book by Roger Olson, who is himself an Arminian, and he has written a defense of Arminianism titled Arminian Theology: Myths and Realities. You might be surprised to hear me recommend this book . . .

Part IV: One more recommendation, and an explanation of why this issue is important to me
I have not always been a Calvinist. I grew up in a family that had been Wesleyan Methodists for generations — and even after I became a Christian, it was several years before I finally came to the point where I could affirm the biblical doctrine of election without trying to explain it away.

Part V: Why this issue is really a lot simpler than most people think
. . . the truths of Calvinism so much permeate the heart of the gospel message, that even if you think you are a committed and consistent proponent of Arminianism, if you truly affirm the gospel you have already conceded the principle points of Calvinism anyway.

Part VI: We love Him because He first loved us
Notice: this profound text is a clear statement about the sovereign power of God’s love. It is a lesson about the sovereignty of God’s saving purpose. It is a celebration of the glory of sovereign love.

Part VII: A second look at one of the shortest verses in the Bible
So let’s talk about “limited atonement.” Some of you are thinking, There’s a doctrine no Arminian presupposes. Actually, I think anyone who believes the atonement was substitutionary presupposes a Calvinistic doctrine of the atonement. And historic, evangelical Arminians do believe in substitutionary atonement.

: Conclusion
Nothing is more biblical than these doctrines that are commonly labeled Calvinism. In a way, it is a shame they have been given an extrabiblical name, because these truths are the very essence of what Scripture teaches. The very gist of Calvinism is nowhere more clearly stated than in the simple words of our verse: “We love Him, because He first loved us.”

Labels: ,

09:09 MT |
Post a Comment | Home | Track with co.mments

 • 2001-08  • 2005-05  • 2005-06  • 2005-07  • 2005-08  • 2005-09  • 2005-10  • 2005-11  • 2005-12  • 2006-01  • 2006-02  • 2006-03  • 2006-04  • 2006-05  • 2006-06  • 2006-07  • 2006-08  • 2006-09  • 2006-10  • 2006-11  • 2006-12  • 2007-01  • 2007-02  • 2007-03  • 2007-04  • 2007-05  • 2007-06  • 2007-07  • 2007-08  • 2007-09  • 2007-10  • 2007-11  • 2007-12  • 2008-01  • 2008-02  • 2008-03  • 2008-04  • 2008-05  • 2008-06  • 2008-07  • 2008-08  • 2008-09  • 2008-10  • 2008-11  • 2008-12  • 2009-01  • 2009-02  • 2009-03  • 2009-04